Home   ›   Guild Wars 2 Suggestions

Guild Wars 2 Suggestions Add Answer

Welcome to the Guild Wars 2 suggestions pages. This is the place where you get to let ArenaNet know what you want to happen with their upcoming game. They might listen, they might not - but that's all part of the fun!

*Note from Sersun*: As we learn more about GW2, we'll mark answers as "done", which will remove them from the default list view.

 9 answers marked as "Done"!

393 ANSWERS (1-15) Top All-Time       30 days       365 Days       More...

Rank Your Votes

Your ballot is empty. Sign in to vote on this topic and rank your ballot!

 
94

Expand character creation

#1
A wider variety of character creation controls (height/weight/skin & eye color/hair style/etc).
 
83

Auction house

#2
A place where players can bid on and sell items that they've obtained in the game.
 
80

Limitless roaming

#3
To be able to walk almost anywhere, up any cliff, through any forest, into any building would be a huge frustration-reducer and a nice change for loyal GW players.
 
76

In-game messaging system

#4
Instead of having to wait until a friend comes online, you could send them a message which they can read in their own time. Maybe even a courier system so that people can trade more easily.
 
55

Guild Hall "Village"

#5
Allow the members of a guild to own or inhabit smaller dwellings within the guild hall, a place to display their favorite weapons, plaques with titles, trophies, etc. The dwelling could be personalized, with materials, shape, and size picked by the player
 
53

World-Changing Events

#6
Maybe, every once in a while, especially preceding new expansions, there could be an event that actually changes the world itself. Let me give you an example before you say anything. Lets say, some time, long after the initial release of GW2, they announced an event which would allow all the players of the world to travel to a site outside Arah where they would be able to participate in a mission where they would attempt to take back Arah from the dragon that holds it (probably would involve more than one team of players at a time). We could call it "Remember the True Gods!". For about a month, people would be able to participate in this, and, after that month is over, players would be able to walk through the streets of Arah as a city reclaimed. Players might still be able to participate in the mission by visiting the old site outside of Arah as well.

Then, lets say, about a month later, the Canthan army shows up and starts raiding coastal areas all over Tyria. People would be able to play a series of missions where they the repel Canthan invasion, and after about a month or so of that, Canthan soldiers, who had been appearing in the open areas would start to disappear and the new expansion would come out which would allow us to take the fight to Cantha (I really want to slug it out with this new emperor).

Anyway, that was only an example. Not all of these events need be followed by an expansion, but it would be a great way to add in new content without adding new campaigns. I know it would be hell to program and the devs have already said some things about expansions and campaigns, but I'm just asking if you would like to see these world changing assuming they are possible.

When I first posted this idea in January, there were some really great comments on it that helped elaborate on the idea. You can read them by clicking here
(http://wiki.guildwars.com/wiki/User_talk:Gaile_Gray/Archive_Guild_Wars_2_suggestions/January_2008_Page_2#World_Changing_Events)
 
50

Playable races: Tengu

#7
Tengu already exist in Guild Wars lore as both the Angchu and Sensali tribes and this race continues to be a large fan favourite. It would be a shame to not include Tengu as a playable race in GW2.
 
52

Mounts as Companions

#8
The premise of this idea is fairly simple: combine companions and mounts. Preposterous as it sounds at first, this actually solves several problems posed by incorporating companions and mounts separately.

First, let us deal with a few of the problems caused by mounts. Number one is how to deal with the needs of several races, of different sizes and with different cultures who would all need mounts which suited them. Asura are easy, they could ride golems. Humans could ride anything. Sylvari might ride animated plant constructs, but it would be a pity if those couldn’t fight on their own.

The Norn, however, are too big to ride just about anything I saw in the original GW games short of a hydra. Not to mention the fact that Norn will be capable of transformations in the next game and will either be forced to choose between using mounts or transformations or be force to deal with the sight of a giant bear-man riding a horse.

The Charr have a similar problem. They would look silly riding just about anything other than their siege beasts, and what sense does it make to be toeing around a siege devourer if you can’t lay siege to something with it. That, however would give the Charr an unfair advantage unless all the other mounts were capable of something similar, but if you have that and a companion by your side who also will need a mount to keep up with you, and how is that different from having three companions?

Then there are even worse problems caused by companions. Firstly, we can’t have 3’000 Dunkoros running around in a continuous world. That’s just ridiculous. We could be capable of customizing their appearance, but that still leaves us with the other problems. Another problem is the question, “Why can we only have one companion?” It really doesn’t make a lot of sense to have a party of just two. More than that, why should they not count as part of our party but rather as part of our character? That would mean parties of sixteen, and if mounts can fight then that would turn a party of eight players into a party of forty-eight combatants roving the plains. Lastly, why would we be compensated for not using a companion? It makes no sense. Do companions suck the life force out of our characters to sustain themselves?

Granted, many of these problems do not need to be fixed in order to have a running game (technically, you could have 3,000 Dunkoros roaming the plains) but why put up with a problem when there is a simple way to fix it: combine companions and mounts.

This is all based off if the idea that there is no real difference between a mount that can fight while you’re not riding on it and a companion. Besides that, it answers all of the aforementioned questions and problems. No one will ask questions if 3’000 mounts who look alike are roaming the field. It makes sense that you would not be able to bring more than one mount wherever you go, and of course they wouldn’t count as part of our party: they’re mounts. Their ability to combine with your character as well as their sub-par fighting capabilities could compensate for their propensity to double the size of your party. Finally, the benefits lost by bringing a mount could be seen as a representation of the extra energy needed to maintain control of a mount in battle.

It is perfectly natural to assume that Charr would both fight alongside their siege beasts and use them as mounts. As for the Norn, they would need neither mounts nor companions. They would need to be compensated for their lack of a companion, but it makes sense that the Norn would travel alone. Also, they are a bit too large for any mount and they could be made capable of running at increased speeds over set distances on account of their superior physique. Their transformations would also compensate for the combat abilities denied them by their lack of mounts.

The unique nature of mounts made for each race would add variety to the game and could be used as part of the race advantages system. As each mount would be different, each could have different abilities. All of them would need to be capable of equitable speed so that parties could stay together, however, their combat and defensive capabilities could vary widely.

Each should complement the advantages and disadvantages of each race and be suited to each races attitudes and customs. For example, the Asura, being magically adept, would probably need their golems to protect or heal them in battle while they cast spells. Some golems might also augment the strength of Asura warriors in battle, compensating for their physical weaknesses.

I will shortly post links to pages proposing more specific ideas for each race both here and on my personal suggestions page if you are interested in finding out more.

Norn: Transformations
(http://wiki.guildwars.com/wiki/User:Shai_Halud/Norn:_Transformations)

Asura and Sylvari: Golems and Jagganathen
(http://wiki.guildwars.com/wiki/User:Shai_Halud/Asura_and_Sylvari:_Golems_and_Jagganathen)

Humans and Charr: Calvary and Siege Beasts
(http://wiki.guildwars.com/wiki/User:Shai_Halud/Humans_and_Charr:_Calvary_and_Siege_Beasts)

As for Those Who do not Wish to Bring Companions...
(http://wiki.guildwars.com/wiki/User:Shai_Halud/As_for_Those_Who_do_not_Wish_to_Bring_Companions...)
 
50

Randomized enemy appearance

#9
Instead of cloned enemies coming after you, what if each (or just a couple) were different in height/color/armor type? Even a few random changes to one or two enemies could add a bit more realism into the game and add a little variety when killing giant mobs.
 
49

Hairstylist

#10
Some kind of in-game feature (NPC) that would allow you to change your character's hair (color, style, etc) after that character has been created.
 
48

Weapon sheaths

#11
I haven't seen this yet so ill put it out there. Why have weapons disappear when we go into a city or outpost? Just have a back strap for staffs, hammers, sythes, spears,bows, and/or shields, a belt loop for axes, wands, and offhands, and a sheath for swords and daggers. Obiviously not all of these items would be on your character at the same time, but it would add variety in towns to see warriors walking around with shields on their backs, or an assasin with a pair of daggers at their belt.
 
45

Useful minipets

#12
Allow mini pets to pick up gold and/or items in aggro range and return them to its master.
 
36

Sailing and Naval Combat.

#13
Battle can take place in many environments, and each can produce it's own experience if the environments are interactive enough and disticnt in challenge and situation. But few are as unique or interactive as a moving environment, instead of simply battling on the land, battles could take place on moving ships on the sea.

With Guilds comes the opportunity to have guild owned ships instead of just Guild Halls, with this customizable and player controlled vessel, Guilds could explore the open seas, visit new locations for exploration and conquest, and most of all, engage in open combat on the sea, naturally brining together two mobile environments on a liquid plain.

The ability to steer your ship, operate it's propultion and armament, attack ship to ship, or board eachothers ships and fight directly in normal combat fashion allows this means of battle to be deeply original from most games as well as adding exponentially more activities than in the normal combat structure.
 
32

Spells need real effects not just redundant effects.

#14
OK to put this simple; when my elementalist casts Armor of Earth why cant i see rocks on my characters in the shape of armor for the spells duration, or why not have Well of Blood actually raise a well from the ground full of bloss that moves to the injured ally character. It doesn't even have to be this complex I just got bored of the fact that half of the spells form magical floating green circles, half the attacks are different colored balls of light, and the rest of the effects didn't show up at all except for in the top left corner of my screen telling me they were there. I just like the idea of a more intense battle with some real effort put into the battle imagery. Even blood would have been nice now and then (not ridiculously graphic of course.)
Sorry for any spelling or grammar errors im tired.
 
34

No profession limit for races

#15
You should be able to combine all races with all primary professions, and you should have good reasons to do so. There should not be any race or class restrictions.

I loved being a Night Elf in the WoW trial, but I couldn't be that class that summons demons with that race (Warlock). I much preferred the "Pick any two professions" model of GW, especially with their money back guarantee (switch the secondary anytime). Each race should have incentives to combine with any professions. For example, the Norn shape-shifting should include animal forms useful to spell casters.
 

Analytics

288 Members have voted on one or more of the 393 answers. This topic was started by Brokunn Administrator: 2,149 points on September 17th, 2008. Tags: features, feedback, ideas, suggestions, wishlist

More Reports

Comments

Add a Comment

Avatar Image
         
guildie guildie: 37 points   3 years ago
There are so many great ideas it is hard to prioritize
Reply     Link
Avatar Image
         
Theresa.Shamisen Theresa.Shamisen: 43 points   3 years ago

I agree. However I'd like to be able to customize my characters a bit more, since I'm a character-creating junkie, so that would be my number one. :D

Link
Avatar Image
         
falconeye falconeye: 88 points   3 years ago
This List can potentially get out of hand... is it possble to merge several suggestions that relate to each other or are equally popular? Should it be kept to 30 suggestion and move excess into distinctive aspects of GW2? Example: Climb, Jump, Walk, and Swim are share the exact same issues and are seemingly in high demand -- expanded ways to travel (we all wanted to do these at least once in the game). While several others related to expanded character creation options or real-time grapical environmental affects.
Reply     Link
Avatar Image
         
Sersun Administrator: 1,781 points   3 years ago

As we get more and more suggestions, we can create more focused topics, such as "How should character creation be improved?" In fact, there's nothing stopping you from adding that now, so I'd say go for it :) http://guildwars.grupthink.com/ask/

As we get more contributions, it will probably become obvious which new topics should be created. This topic may eventually be obsoleted by the more focused topics, but for now it's a good indication of which ideas are in high demand.

We're taking an organic approach to growing the community so we don't break up the discussion into too many categories, too soon.

Link
Avatar Image
         
Sersun Administrator: 1,781 points   3 years ago

I forgot to add: Yes, duplicate answers and topics can be merged, preserving vote counts.

Feel free to report "dupes" to myself or Brokunn.

Link
Avatar Image
         
BahamutKaiser BahamutKaiser: 257 points   3 years ago
To be honest, I perfered the wiki format, I've already noticed the 60 second edit timer, which would make it very hard to continue a work in progress, and this isn't nearly as organized as the wiki was, with linked topic, branching variations and plenty of opportunity to make continous improvements.

This site feels like it is designed for finished ideas, and I don't know how that fits in with group thinking, it seems like the only benifit is a clean and professional looking backdrop. I'm still new to this, so maybe some of you could personally share some features available from this site.
Reply     Link
Avatar Image
         
Sersun Administrator: 1,781 points   3 years ago

Hi and welcome BahamutKaiser!

That 60-second timer is only for comments.Topics and answers can be edited at any point by the their authors and also by anyone with elevated privileges (moderators, admins, etc..) .

Link
Avatar Image
         
BahamutKaiser BahamutKaiser: 257 points   3 years ago
I guess that's alright, the essetials are covered. But if you've seen some of my responses, you'd know that I can't proof-read my work within one minute.
Reply     Link
Avatar Image
         
Sersun Administrator: 1,781 points   3 years ago

Hehe true. Maybe it's as simple as increasing the time limit for edits? I know forums have some limitations like this but I forget what the conventional rules are.

Link
Avatar Image
         
BahamutKaiser BahamutKaiser: 257 points   3 years ago
Probably an hour, it does leave room for the comment to be changed by the time someone reads it, but than this site isn't high on traffic right now, so it is more likely that it woln't be seen until some point later in the day or the next day.
Reply     Link
Avatar Image
         
Bethlen Bethlen: 118 points   3 years ago
I think a link to Guild Wars Wikis "The Movement of the World"-page, the Guild Wars 2 FAQ-page and the Guild Wars 2 page should be linked in the topic, as well as a link to the topic with already confirmed features to avoid ideas that goes against the features already confirmed. It will probably pop up some of those in the future anyway, but it will hopefully keep the amount down as well as leading people to a place where they can read more about GW2.
Reply     Link
Avatar Image
         
fedora fedora: 101 points   3 years ago
I believe that keeping a low level cap and the standard 8 skill bar is very important.

If GW2 wants to competitively compete with WoW they have to create a unique game to attract the right audience.

Expanding the world map and a persistent world is very important for an RPG feeling.

GW1 felt like a one person game because I would just go through levels with a few friends much like Fable and other games alike.
Reply     Link
Avatar Image
         
Triton Triton: 31 points   2 years ago
I really enjoy reading and reviewing some of the thoughts/suggestions/ideas by everybody because it gives me a feeling like GW2 is so so close and I'm extremely excited to see how it is.

Just a small idea I have that I haven't seen mentioned...is maybe there could be a box in the general options that allows one to manipulate their IGN so that it indicates to other players that they are in a "roleplaying mode". Just a thought =)
Reply     Link
Avatar Image
         
Sersun Administrator: 1,781 points   2 years ago

Triton, you should add that idea as an answer to this topic. Good one.

Link
Avatar Image
         
Deathful Deathful: 46 points   2 years ago
I really think we should summarize all answers putting them in categories, separating what problem are the ideas trying to solve. There are many answers on ideas of how to solve the same issues.

so we would put all the answers for one issue on one answer, quick references of all the ideas for that issue and links to the original posts... then put links to the "Categories answers" on the Question text...

I mean, if ANet actually comes here to read some suggestions, they won't read them all and many of the answers that should really be read won't.

They would instead read something like:
"Guilds Improvements:
->answer #1 quick description and a link to original
->answer#2
->etc."

so if someone from ANet comes to this site, they will read the quick descriptions and only read the full idea and the comments on it from ideas they found interesting....

This should really be done! Else, what's the point of this site?!
Reply     Link
Avatar Image
         
I was Here I was Here: 103 points   2 years ago
I hope these opinions help improve things and are not to much of a pain for anet.
Reply     Link
Avatar Image
         
steveajr steveajr: 5 points   2 years ago
i want to see more in to guild wars 2



all the kool stuff that i never seen happen in a mmorpg



!. Hunters get attacked by there pets if they don't feed them food when there hungry



2. climb trees to break limbs off and set traps :)
and make your arrows with bird feathers and stones you find in the ground kill and skin deer for clothes hunters only



3. clmib ladders grab on and pull your self up



4. armor for your pets to carry your loot pack mules :) and makes them stronger



5. jump over stuff like falling rocks and logs make sidestep to walk around cliffs



6. fishing
for pets


7. cammo knife to hunt for hunters only



8. make the swords take 5 days to forge so you have to wate on a stronger swords and other weapons



9. when you put poison on your weapons it drips when you stab something it becomes green in the place you stab him is where he starts to bleed blood drip down and such



10. guilds have more towers ike if i was a hunter or a assassin and you was in the tower i have to sneak passed the gards and climb the towers to kill them but it well not be easy to do so







12. flips and moves for assassins and other characters



13. We bough all the packs for Guild wars and hope this would make up for it special missions and items to the people that beaten and bought the add ons like the mission pack with gwen mission pack :)

work with me :) hear
Reply     Link

History

ImgImgImgImgImgImgImgImgImgImg
crocus added an answer: "Improving dynamic events"  (2 days ago)

Like this topic?

Rate or report this topic:
  +35.3    

Watch this topic and get notified of any updates:

Please log in or register to see notification options.